Assertion (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and by M. Jary

By M. Jary

Statement is a time period usually utilized in linguistics and philosophy yet infrequently outlined. This in-depth learn surveys and synthesizes various philosophical, linguistic and mental literature at the subject, after which offers an in depth account of the cognitive tactics all in favour of the translation of assertions.

Show description

Read Online or Download Assertion (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition) PDF

Best semantics books

Semantics (Language Workbooks)

Semantics is an obtainable and functional advent to formal semantics, the examine of linguistic that means, for college kids new to the topic. Semantics:* indicates how meanings are equipped up and interrelated* presupposes little or no past wisdom of grammar or linguistic terminology * incorporates a thesaurus of technical phrases* presents a development of workouts with solutions given on the again * backs up the actions with brief, transparent reasons* comprises an appendix on units and capabilities.

Lyrik als Sprache unserer Zeit? Paul Celans Gedichtbände: 404. Sitzung am 15. Oktober 1997 in Düsseldorf

Das Verhältnis der Politik zur Kunst und speziell zur Dichtung ist immer schwierig gewesen. Das zeigt etwa die Beziehung der römischen Kaiser zu den Dichtern. Der preußische König Friedrich Wilhelm III. conflict in seiner Nüchternheit eher indigniert, als Novalis in des Königs Ehe die Einigkeit im Staat vorgebildet sehen wollte.

The Parameter of Aspect

Whereas engaged on this venture i've got acquired institutional help of a number of types, for which i'm so much thankful. I thank the Institute for complex research at Stanford collage, and the Spencer beginning. for a stimulating surroundings during which the fundamental inspiration of this e-book used to be built. The Max Planck Institute for Psycho linguistics at Nijmegen enabled me to spend a number of months engaged on the the manuscript.

Additional info for Assertion (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition)

Sample text

It may well be that, armed with the concepts of belief and assertion, we can devise an accurate model of communication according to which assertions derive their meaning from beliefs that they express. Thus, as long as philosophical questions of conceptual priority are kept apart from empirical questions about the cognitive processes involved in utterance interpretation, there is no conflict between the view that the notion of assertion is conceptually prior to the notion of belief, and the view that assertoric utterances derive their content from the beliefs they express.

For some, most notably Grice, assertion is to be analysed as being characterised by the intention that the hearer should come to think that the speaker believes that P, there often being an ulterior intention to the effect that the hearer should also come to believe that P himself (1989: 123). com - licensed to Universitetsbiblioteket i Tromso - PalgraveConnect - 2011-04-20 38 as we saw in Chapter 2, by Bach and Harnish (1979), although the latter see the intention that the hearer believe that P as a primary, not ulterior, assertoric intention.

The preceding discussion has brought us to step 4 of Dummett’s argument for the priority of belief over assertion. We must now ask which practice best exemplifies treating as true. As we have just seen, to treat a sentence as true is, on Dummett’s account, to grasp its practical and inferential consequences. What behaviour would count as evidence of grasping these? While other forms of behaviour might demonstrate a grasp of some of the practical consequences of treating a sentence as true, many, perhaps most, of its inferential consequences can only be demonstrated by asserting (or assenting to assertions of) those consequences and denying those statements which are not consequences.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.70 of 5 – based on 42 votes